Find a Lawyer

QAISAR ABBAS versus THE STATE

Section 426 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/34, was filed against the accused on suspicion of the deceased's father-in-law, with no direct evidence available to link the accused to the accused. Additional criminal conviction before the accused. The prosecution's witnesses, who were close relatives of the victim, could not be resolved for more than two years and their appeal is unlikely to be dismissed in the near future even if the defendant's sentence remains intact. ? The prosecution's witnesses were yet to be determined on the basis of an extra-judicial confession made by the suspects before the close relative of the victim on the very next day, when they were extradited to the police when they confessed to the crime. The officer never disclosed this fact during the investigation. Under Section 161, the CRPC was also not able to identify the prosecution that was recorded for any reason why the accused should not be released on bail thus the accused's sentence was suspended and his bail was granted. Allowed advocate for immigration from Shankiari lawyer