Find a Lawyer

NIHAR BAGUM versus HIDAYAT SHAH

West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 & Schedule ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ??? Dwyer? the amount? Privileges ??? The constitutional jurisdiction, in which the defendant / defendant's divorced wife Dover recovered, claimed that her dower amounted to Rs 10,000, but the defendant / defendant wrote in her The statement alleges that the sum of Rs 49 was withdrawn only to the plaintiff / applicant. ??? The appellate court had placed Rs 10,000 as a dower amount passed by the trial court, which was paid in the form of golden jewelery by the plaintiff / respondent in the claim of the claimant / applicant. Was? The plaintiff / defendant stated in his written statement that the position was taken as Rs 49 was fixed as the dower of the defendants which was paid to him while in his statement in the case he claimed that the plaintiff claimed What is and is said to have been played in the form of golden ornaments. ??? ??? , It can be concluded that the appellate court below not only contained false documents on the record, but also exercised its jurisdiction openly, asserting that the defendant / defendant had in the form of golden jewelry Did Dover pay? ??? Under the High Court constitutional jurisdiction, place the judgment and order of the appellate court down and restore the trial court's decision and order relating to the collection of the doer money. lawer from fb area from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer