Find a Lawyer

MUMRAIZ KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

The Punjab Minor Canals Act, 1905, Section 43 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 10 and Section 115 of the plaintiff filed the return of the legitimate plaintiff entitled to irrigate their ancestral land with the same water. Flowing through the water course. All authorized forums, including the Board of Revenue Defendants, dismissed the case, before the competent forums filed a similar case before the civil court, in addition, the appropriate forum appeared in the lack of litigation. For the defendants were returned, the trial was decided. After a thorough survey of the evidence and the contents of the record, the Appellate Court confirmed that there was no complicated question that needed to be followed and that the evidence needed to be read. The High Court found itself in legal legal forums. Agreeing with reasonable conclusions of the case and in the absence of any illegal or irregularities being pointed out by the defendants, no case has been brought in to obtain the remand of the case only by trial court returns. To determine the limiting question to find the case, however, before the appropriate plate The presentation was not known to be appropriate for the plaintiff only, but before the forum was already exhausted and the plaintiffs were challenged with the same decision given by the respective forums, in which case if the civil court concerned forum If no case of illegal or judicial defect or irregularity was found by the plaintiff, instead of returning the plaintiff to the plaintiff, the plaintiff would have been excluded from the case. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Lalshanra lawyer