Find a Lawyer

BISMILLAH KHAN versus ABDUL QAHAR KHAN WADAN

Section 52 of the Public Act 1976 was on the petitioner to prove allegation of corruption and unlawful action against retired candidate Ounce to prove that any person cast a fake vote on the basis of a fake national identity card. And to further prove that such a process was carried out in conjunction with the Returning Candidate, however, it was not solely relied on to prove that the Local Commissioner appointed by the Election Tribunal. The report relied on whether a fake voter ID card would be used to cast voters. It was. The Commissioner, however, was in fact the wrong applicant's request that approximately 13,000 bogus national ID cards were produced and their use was based on speculations and defects and no evidence was brought to the electoral tribunal so that it could reasonably doubt it. To prove that the retired candidate was responsible for releasing the bogus. NGOs ask Afghan applicants to prove allegations of illegal and corrupt national ID cards of Afghan refugees to vote in favor of Onaz Bai. He failed to present even one witness, even his own polling agents, to prove that he was not allowed to challenge the vote by the retiring candidate's polling agents, not just the applicant himself. Failing to present the polling agents, not a single witness was produced. To prove applicant's own allegations from the polling staff, except that his own statement did not bear witness that the retiring candidate's polling agents challenged the applicants / polling agents. top advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer