SHAH NAWAZ JUNEJO versus JAM MASHOOQ ALI
Representatives of the Special Representatives Act 1976 section 52 refused to cast their ballots to the returning officer, admitting in their evidence that they had received complaints that some presiding officers had refused to allow these voters to cast their votes. Was denied whose national identity cards began with specific letters. The alphabetical Returning Officer prepared a copy of the instructions issued to all presiding officers in which they were instructed to allow such voters to cast their ballots, however, these instructions were issued no later than 2 pm. The choice was plenty of time, spread over an area of over 100 square miles. These instructions have been spent to reach every polling station. Such applicants are of the opinion that by this time a large number of voters had left the polling stations without casting their votes. The belt was also not involved in collecting the result. There is evidence that it has received thousands of applications on photostat copies of Pro-Pharma forms but they only have a few dozen postal ballot papers. This fact shows that not all applicants who were in the thousands were provided with postal ballot papers, so they were denied their right to vote. The invalid voter list was used for polling purposes and a large number of voters were excluded from voting rights and voting was lost by election officials. The result was materially affected and therefore selectively theirs
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Zhob lawyer