Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ KHAN versus TAHIRA BEGUM

The second appeal in the jurisdiction of the High Court of Appeal from the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right to Procurement Act 1993 Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 of the Supreme Court. The fact is that the concurrent findings of the two courts below the question of fact under the courts, it was entitled to a writ before the matter being sold and exchanged, where evidence was obtained by the subordinate courts on the facts side and Was fully considered. In any case, such a finding by the High Court cannot be bothered simply because the argument drawn by the Courts below was not properly produced where the High Court had obtained the results. Has been upset that it has no jurisdiction under the section. 100, the CPC High Court cannot disturb the fact-finding in the second appeal simply because the evidence presented may have some further perspective. The following were the judgments of the courts in which the High Court also clearly proved that they did not face any kind of illegal interference, including the findings of the High Court, including the address of the other courts. The Supreme Court maintained. family advocate from Daska lawyer