Find a Lawyer

MAQSOODA BEGUM versus GHULAM QADIR

Suit for possession of property in question under Article 142, Limitation Act, 1908, under Articles 142 and 144 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Limitation Act, 12 years for possession of immovable property The limitation provides that when the plaintiff, while resident in the possession of the property or occupied has been discontinued, the reason for the proceedings in such cases will be considered as the date of the settlement or with the discharge of the plaintiff's possession. The relevant Article 142, Limitation Act, 1908 shall not apply. The seizure case was based on the title and not on the charge of disposing of the property from Article 144, the Limitation Act, 1908, to determine the possession of immovable property or interest for a period of 12 years or otherwise subject to the suit. Was not specifically provided for a reason to run. Article 144, will come to the date when the defendant's possession of the defendant goes negative against the defendant, however, he failed to identify anything specific on the day he claimed that the defendant had transferred the property against the defendant. The claim of possession is within 12 years from the date the defendant claimed the negative possession, thus, there will be no guarantee of interference with the courts' concurrence. Under the circumstances list of supreme court advocates from Hangu lawyer