Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAEEM IQBAL versus ZARINA


Scope of Receipt of Specific Amounts Based on Devices capable of negotiating Instruments Act 1881A XXXVII, R 3 Negotiable Devices Act (XXVI of 1881), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Optionally appear in court by a lawyer but instead ask for leave to appear and defend. He presented the plaintiff's written statement in court. The trial court was proceeding under litigation that the trial court lacked jurisdiction or that the document, which was based on the case, did not vacate the promise, the defendant had no benefit. Challenged the authenticity of the authenticity if it had taken leave to defend the defendant's claim that the document in question, which was not genuine, would not be able to be negotiated with the definition of a negotiation tool. , Therefore, the leave of appeal in this case was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.