ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED versus SHABBIR AHMAD
Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance 1979 Sections 6 (1) (a) and 12 (1) processing the bank loan judge's request for processing order asking that the holder sell the gold jewelry. Be instructed to collect (as a guarantee of debt by the creditor of the judgment) the amount of the figure) and then issue the golden jewelry that the holder of the judgment has not disclosed. The jewelery has already been sold during the suit banking court, the commissioner was appointed by the local commissioner to sell it without notice. The question related to jewelery was challenged by the order through a review petition but to no avail. The validity of the High Court against the dismissal of this order allowed the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979. There is no specific provision or any order of the Special Banking Court, however, to be barred from requesting a hearing or a review of the proceedings, however, may be challenged by the ReHCort Appeal but such appeal is an interdict. Will not be authorized to appeal the special case which does not resolve the entire matter before it is discharged. To consider the Section 6 (L) (A), Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Ordinance, 1979, in which the special banking court has been granted all powers of the civil court under the special court during the proceedings. This may allow the review of the interim order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
