Find a Lawyer

ALLAH RAKHA versus MUKHTAR AHMAD BAIG

Transfer of Property Act 1882 Sections 53A and 58 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The plaintiff was issued a PTO by the Department of Defense pending, considering two documents, both execution, mortgage cancellation and sale agreement. The same sale deed was, however, not to be registered until PTD was issued = The Tail Suite Tile Court granted the preliminary injunction to recover the mortgage on payment of a specific price in the mortgage deed. That the matter in favor of the plaintiff was a mortgage. However, the appellate court heard that the transaction was, in fact, a sale but the property could not be sold until the PTD was released. The High Court reversed the appellate court's finding and held the trial court's position that "the matter is mortgaged, the issues of the justification case clearly indicate." Is that there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant's case that in this case, the fact that the rtage proceedings executed by the plaintiff through the sale motif appeared to be a suicide attack. Meaning only to secure the sale transaction, therefore, could not be considered in isolation, but the sale transaction was in fact complete with other conditions of the matter. The plaintiff was noticed by the plaintiff and the property was also seized by the plaintiff's claim that the sale price was higher than the settlement amount and the amount agreed in the sale agreement for the purpose of supporting evidence. It was rejected by all the courts below. In such cases, the sale agreement was dependent on the issuance of PTD which was only a b best advocate from Swatmingora lawyer