Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus SARDAR KHAN

Section 7 (5) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Competing for the post of Chairman, District Council Appellant received 7 votes, while Defendant got 6 votes while Presiding Officer had one of the Appellant's. The vote was invalidated and he later cast his ballot. Much between the Appellant and the Respondents, in turn, went in favor of the Respondents, which was termed the Selection Election Tribunal, which has power in the debate of the Appellant but due to the fact that there was no relief. Denied that the appellant had agreed to file the case. An affidavit High Court scrutinized the ballot papers and found that a ballot paper counted in favor of the respondents, with only two names that could be counted in favor of either of the two candidates. In a series of appellant's votes, which the Presiding Officer declared to be invalid instead of a cross mark, the High Court had marked differently, however, found that the best way to re-election was LEA. ? Approved to consider appeals, was the High Court justified in ordering re-election rather than appointing the appellant, or after concluding that a ballot paper counted in favor of the respondents was not invalid ? law firms from Killa Abdullah lawyer