Find a Lawyer

JAMIL AKHTAR versus M .D. A. MIRPUR

Mirpur Municipal Committee Regulation for Development and Disposal for Plots or State 1985 Regulation 2 Azam Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Appellant's Corner Plot Allotment to pay extra due to the corner of his plot. Was needed. The appellant paid the whole amount and took such a plot in his possession. After that, the authority created another plot and sold it as a corner plot, against the appellant's objection to making another corner plot. Ignoring this, he filed a constitutional petition which was dismissed. The appellant and Corner were prevented from adopting the position on receiving additional money due to the plot, saying that the plot sold to the appellant was not a waist plot when the appellant in question was allotted as a corner plot, It became his right to take advantage of it. That there would be no plot on one side of the plot, such as the fact that the auto was taken away, the appellant was an aggrieved person who had the right to request the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, which had the advantage or privilege of the area. It was sought to challenge the change in the plan which could not be withdrawn by the appellant authority in return for additional payment, and the fact of the matter would be that it was sufficient to declare itself And the formation of a plot with no jurisdiction and without any legal influence as to form another plot. S Corner plot with plot monitoring not reveal any authority to the competent authority for the Town Planner creates verbal guidance Pakistan, top advocate family court from Muzaffarabad lawyer