Find a Lawyer

KHANAN KHAN versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR DIVISION, PESHAWAR

The applicant for the acquisition of NWFP Urban Planning Ordinance 1978 Section 60 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 5 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition remained silent for a period of two years and thereafter against compensation. Appeal was filed and his request for a delayed concession, along with the increase in compensation, was rejected because his application was banned after a time restriction that he had no knowledge of the acquisition process, A large part was covered, which was reported. Compensation was provided by the Department Authority after the declaration of the award and the occupation of the occupied land, the delayed application for concession did not meet the requirements of Section 5, Limitation Act 1908, nor was it timely appealed. There is no reason to prioritize, nor has the delay been specified. In each day, which is an example of late condolences, although it is also considered that the applicant was unaware of the award, it was granted within six weeks of the award under the Ordinance of Urban Planning, Section 60, Northwestern Frontier Province. Appeal will be compulsory. The question regarding the delay of 1978 was set at the touchstone of the provisions of Section 5, the Limitation Act, 1908, and not on the principle of equity equity, however, it helps to remain vigilant and not to the effect of the order, Is involved in a legal case. Defective to guarantee interference with constitutional jurisdiction ask a advocate free from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer