Find a Lawyer

TAHIR MAHMOOD versus MUHAMMAD NADEEM

Pakistan Penal Code Section 337/324/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The High Court, using its constitutional jurisdiction through an unconstitutional order, restored a criminal complaint filed by an accused in the Magistrate's Court. Was. In the police case filed under Section 2302/4 324 / under 34, the PPC, while presenting its cross-version of the incident, said that Syed's criminal complaint was dismissed by the lower courts, but the High Court was of the view. That the complainant had filed a preliminary case for summoning the accused. (Applicant) In the police case, along with the FIR, the criminal complaint has revealed that both sides resorted to firing with deadly weapons in this case and as an aggressor each party exercised their right of self-defense. Claimed to have fired. The complainant, who filed a criminal complaint, sustained a firearm injury, with the confession in his leg trial court on which the police case was to be heard, as well as the decision to adjourn the complaint. D. Which of the two sides had resorted to aggression in the High Court through the restoration of the criminal complaint, both parties had the opportunity to present their case before the trial court in the proper context and whoever was found guilty The sentence could be punished, otherwise the accused could not be convicted before the High Court before the matter could be restored. The evidence was scrutinized thoroughly and its decision was just and fair, and in any case, it was perverse or Was not shocking, so the Supreme Court refused to call for intervention I immigration advocates from Utror lawyer