MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus NASIR AHMAD
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) case for the specific performance of the sale contract in favor of the plaintiff, however, no appeal was filed against such order, however , Failed to deposit the balance amount in court. According to the trial court's order in which the case was filed, the claimant has to submit a certain balance amount on the specified date, failing which the plaintiff's bail will be deducted. The plaintiff's request for extension was dismissed. After the court had approved such a decree, the function had become official, so it is expected in the jurisdiction of the High Court that the plaintiff is allowed to submit the balance sale price on or before the court date. Go And further directed that in the case of default of payment of the purchase amount within the specified time, the case will be filed and the dismissal court will become furniture officer, after the order has been approved and given by the order holder. There was no time extension left on request. That the contract will terminate upon termination by the default holder, regardless of the default clause in the decree. In the High Court, there has been an opinion on the question of whether the trial court has become a fiduciary after decreeing for the sale's specific performance. Because the agreement, and no Supreme Court decision on such a matter, required a formal declaration by the Supreme Court, the circumstances allowed for appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Fateh Jang lawyer