Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ SAIGOL versus BCCI

Rules 24, 115 and OXIV, R 2 of the Civil Code 1908 were the reasons for the transfer of the civil suit from the civil court to the second court by transfer of the civil judge from the civil court to the second civil court. The court, at the request of the defendants, ruled that the jurisdiction of the preliminary matter should be decided as the interim orders are capable of revision of the High Court which were filed by the final order and even In a separate order, the trial court is of the opinion that the jurisdiction should be decided as a preliminary issue, not to suggest that it is interested in or in favor of a particular party. ? As long as the interim order on its face is judicially approved, though it appears to be illegal, giving the trial person no reason to give a reason for the complaint to proceed for the primary purpose transfer No substantive basis or material was brought on the exercise of jurisdictional record of jurisdiction for external deliberation, under which it can be said that the trial is either prejudicial or discriminatory in the court which disputes the transfer of cases. The district judge may grant the transfer of the order by approving the orders. Exercised jurisdiction illegally and orders to move the civil judge from a civil court to another civil court with material irregularities were set aside and the cases to be heard by the same civil judge. Which they were pending at the time of approval of the transfer. Orders registration advocate from Bhakkar lawyer