Find a Lawyer

YASSER BASHIR versus FARZANA TABASSAM

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Rr ll & 12 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 Constitutional Applicant had passed the B Exam which had obtained 625/900 marks as before. Post was changed. Another notification and the respondents who got more marks than the applicant was placed above and above the applicant under the President's order The rules related to the university calendar prohibit any candidate from contesting for the first position. Otherwise, do not consider it for the authorities to consider it for the position of merit even if the applicant is of the view that the respondents were given grace marks on the successful completion of the said test, such fact for them as merit. Will not be disqualified to contest the election to see the court in arbitrary relief Qdar in the case of refusal of the applicant's conduct and relief if it appears that the applicant has brought himself back to the EN and other officials have recovered the hope that this favorable result. Consequently, they could not challenge the jurisdiction of these authorities if they relieved the respondents, which in turn left the respondents (the applicant receiving more marks) and the aforementioned. The applicant was issued in accordance with the equity of the matter. For this, it was not open to attack by the constitutional request, thus, by way of a constitutional application, in connection with the applicant's second-respondent's department of appeal, it also found no substance. Went to, why? advocates from Bagh lawyer