HAJRAN versus ABDUL AZIZ
West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957 Section 8 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 185 (3) The Board of Revenue revises its first order which applies to the applicant's former Part Board of Revenue. Was approved against. , Said in its first order that the Collector had to explain the order to the applicant, record its statement and a copy of the order to be submitted to its Board of Revenue also stated that As the applicant widow, she will be prepared. The Collector, neither the applicant's statement was recorded nor did he explain his decision to the Board of Revenue, nor did he, in order to hear it in review by a simple production copy of the order with a revision request She submitted a copy of the order, which resulted in her being unaware of the order. The petitioner of the Board of Revenue dated 12 11 1966, however, found out about the order of the Board of Revenue in 1976 and then moved the request for review, which was delayed. Filing a Review Request The High Court, rejecting the Board of Revenue's order, passed the review stating that Section 5, the Limitation Act, 1908, was not applicable to the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, in There was no option to justify the delay. The applicant was of the view that in accordance with the Order of the Board of Revenue, 11 11 1966, the former party against the applicant was approved, leaving it open for review on the request of the applicant, There is a complaint against this. Any issues in the review application filed by the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Machi Goth lawyer