Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Civil Procedure Code Order III, RR 5 & 4 (2) of Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the CPC recognized agents and applicants on the basis of absence of party's counsel Took this brief from Therefore, notice should be sent directly to them. The High Court did not reject or withdraw such application of the counsel of the prosecuting authority in favor of the lawyer and consequently dismissed the appeal. Appealed on appeal that the petitioners had briefly withheld their appeal and likewise the court should have personally issued notice to the applicants. Such a request was not merit for the applicants, nor was their lawyer filed any document in writing / request. In accordance with the terms of O III, R 4 (2), the CPC seeks leave from the court to determine the power / authority of the lawyer. Therefore, the notice / process presented to the lawyer will be assumed d. Was informed and informed and will be effective for all purposes such as being personally served or served in the party as soon as the Applicant's lawyer is in the process and There is notice of the date of hearing and despite this the court is not refusing the hearing, the court had no obligation to issue the notice to the applicants. Prosecution had rightly taken action to dismiss the applicant's appeal The leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances solicitors from Daulat Pur lawyer