DR. SHAH versus THE STATE
Sections 302/109/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), section 417 (l), against the complainant, the appellant had improved his statement at the trial and was not a reliable witness. The event was not seen free. Witnesses did not support the version of the prosecution by chance, and the weapons recovered from the suspects were not sent to the firearms specialist to determine if the presence of the weapons occurred at a different location. Through the prosecution's prosecution, thus, his case failed to prove beyond a doubt, the trial court properly acquitted the accused, dismissing the appeal against the defendant's fate within the same limits. had gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Quetta lawyer
