Find a Lawyer

FAIZ AHMAD versus GHULAM ZOHRAN

Civil Procedure Code Order III, RR 2, 3 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the CPC recognized agents and applicants, dismiss the appeal for instructions based on the statement of the applicant's lawyer. However, the High Court rejected the appeal while recording the note giving negative remarks against the applicants. The petitioner, requesting that the court should issue a notice to the applicant after the applicant's lawyer had no instruction. There was no merit in such a request. The notice for notice will only come up if the lawyer has sought permission to withdraw from the case when the lawyer in this case has not been informed of the relevant directive. The party was not interested in taking legal action in the court, so the appeal was justified in rejecting the note attached to the central order, though it had a negative comment on the applicant's conduct, for which In the absence of the relevant party, there was no such opportunity to explain its conduct before it became such a target. Should have provided the opportunity. However, before the dismissal of the appeal, the appeal regarding the question of notice was strictly denied, however, the leave of appeal was granted against the note attached to the Central Order, whether in the facts and circumstances given thereto. 'S Remarks. Appeal was granted by the High Court against the applicants and whether they will be dismissed immigration advocates from Lala rukh lawyer