Find a Lawyer

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD HALIM

Basic Laws FR 53 Constitution of Pakistan (1073), Article 185 (3). An employee on the railway employee's suspension and subsequent service rehabilitation, whether entitled to full salary for the period of suspension or for the said period minus Deserves a salary. The amount of subsistence allowance received by him during the suspension period was attributed to the High Court by paying these employees the full salary without any deduction from the payment of the discount allowance during the suspension period. This question was also needed for another single bench of the same High Court, while on the contrary, a decision was made on the basis of the decision of another High Court, in addition, the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court (P.K. LD 1994 SC 72) It was decided that according to the merger of Islam, a suspended public servant should be allowed the full amount of his salary, with the benefits and facilities appealed to him under the service agreement. Approval to consider the effect of provisional allowance payment to public servants, as well as matters such as the effect of the Shariat Appellate Bench. Was also given to consider. In order to give the points involved in this case an authoritative decision on a dispute of general importance, the office was instructed to make an appeal at an early date after receiving the orders of the Chief Justice, which was in view of the Supreme Court decision (1970s). CMR 103), may prefer to set up a full bench to hear the appeal and decide how to become a advocate from Mustang lawyer