Find a Lawyer

FOREST DEPARTMENT versus MUHAMMAD JAN KHAN

Section 79 (b), 80 (b), O XXVII, R3 and Section 115 of the Code of Civil Code 1908, Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Division 42 Divisional Forest Officer against the Forest Department and Executive Engineer by Irrigation Department. Lists the lawsuit filed by. According to this impression, the declaration that 95 silk trees belong to him and he does not have the right to bring these trees through any demarcation or marking process in his possession. The defendant failed to file a written statement within three months after the notice was issued to the defendants. O. VIII, R10, was sanctioned against the defendants department under CPC, the negligence of the CPC filed a miscellaneous proceeding with no interest, instead of filing an appeal and when they failed. Was made but by that time the appeal was banned and it was dismissed. The affirmation of condolences to the defendants in filing the appeal was so negligent and they exhibited such irresponsible property that the government claimed that they had ever been their senior officers / guardian holder. Was not aware of the tree trunks. Under Section 115, the High Court itself took notice, CPC took notice of the fact that the case filed against the Divisional Forest Officer and Executive Engineer Sections 79 (B), 80 (B) and OXVIII, R. 3 were clearly infringing, the CPC suit was not practically against the so-called officers, but against the government, whose property was sought to be allocated by the plaintiff, therefore, by the government departments. Secretaries of departments should have filed a case and set aside the orders of the courts below. top advocates from Haroonabad lawyer