Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ KHALIL versus THE STATE

Section 27 (4) of the Drugs Act 1976 does not match the value of the evidence found in the drug or the fibers, or in this case being silent on the protocol of testing the unofficial analyst or under the rule analysis. Was necessary. Defective and not even the appointment of a government analyst in the sense of the Drugs Act 1976 was illogical and unreasonable, there was no information available about the drug under these limits. May indicate appointment of inspector. Served as a Provincial Inspector for the purpose of the Drugs Act, as prescribed under section 17, that unless the drug is manufactured, the allegation of being the director and manager of the company cannot be proved in this offense Or have no knowledge of such crime. When the company was enforced like the accused was acquitted under circumstances property advocate from Kashmore lawyer