Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD UMER versus AZAD MUHAMMAD

Based on the reconstruction of the premises of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (vi), 15A and 22, after the rehabilitation of the tenant, the owner and the tenant between the tenant on the basis of the restoration agreement. Acquired occupation of the landlord and with the clear move of the tenant to occupy the shop after the re-construction, the landlord relinquished the settlement after the renovation and the tenant was allowed to occupy the same dimension and location. Refused to be occupied, the tenant was entitled to the immediate recovery of occupancy of the shop provided under Section 15A of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979, To occupy the same space and the dimensions of the store, it is fair and appropriate if the controller determines the rental store's location and direction. The multi-storey building was renovated and purposefully taken by the landlord for no purpose; the tenant cannot be occupied. And the tenant's prayer was necessary and necessary in the application to determine the location of the shop [agreement] list of advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer