Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2 (s) 16, 178, 32, 156 (1), (8) (89) (14) (77) Pre-arrest Bail After the final invoice was submitted, the accused was expelled from the High Court's permission to submit fresh application, which was likely to be submitted within two to three weeks. Found as the lawyer of the accused has drawn. A fresh ground cannot be treated in order to guarantee a fresh application and to move an existing application. To entertain an existing application is to amend the previous order without a solid basis and such a court action could be the worst example of an accused lawyer. Is. In filing an existing bail application, which was merely a reproduction of an oral request, in these circumstances the court had done nothing but to shake the sentiment, transferring the application with such background could never be applied. ? On any basis, in any way and under any impression, expectation or circumstance, whatever the case may be, especially the courts' integrity, respect and respect for them, they are dismissed, dismissing the request for bail. went immigration advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer