MUHAMMAD HASSAN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 and 22 Bail Company accused were granted bail because some important aspects of the case were not in the high court. Was brought. The court and, therefore, under a principle of contingency, the accused was not entitled to bail, allegedly from outside the home and not from any enclosed place, the provisions of Article 22 of the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979. Not applicable. Arrested on the same occasion with drugs and his case came under the prohibition clause of section 497 (1), the validity of the CRPC accused's fugitives cannot be considered; Was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Dina lawyer