Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI MANGI versus SASO

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional application dismissing civil service Employee challenged his dismissal order in his constitutional petition that his dismissal violated the principle of natural justice because he did not have to take part in any inquiry. And neither had anyone been provided with an inquiry report, nor had they been given the opportunity to hear or explain their position before approving their dismissal. It has also been alleged that his order of dismissal was not approved by a competent authority and it was passed in violation of the civil servants of Sindh. (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 A public servant was unable to identify any law, rules and regulations to indicate that the person had no authority to pass the dismissal order or His dismissal is a violation of his will. On the other hand, the Roll or Regulation Authority denied that there was an inquiry on the back of civil insurance, or that he did not participate in the inquiry or that he was not given the opportunity to hear and explain his position. Emphasizing that the inquiry board was constituted in which the inquiry was conducted in which the government employee was also participated by the authority and also emphasized that the government employee was given the show cause first. Copies of such showcase notices and responses of public servants due to the notice and subsequent final show cause notice were attached to the comment filed by the official employee of the authority in response to the showcase notice. how to become a advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer