ABID MAHMOOD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 240, 199, 212 and 185 (3) Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 8 of Pakistan Engineering Council Act (V of 1976), Submitted Service Petitioner \ Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the constitutional petition was rejected by prohibiting it under Article 212 of the Constitution when the High Court held that engineering graduates were presented to the applicants and diploma holders as respondents, Because the parties were effectively governed by litigation. In the matter of appointment and development of the Engineering Council Act, 1976, and this Act did not permit persons who were not fully qualified engineers, but were diploma holders who held certain positions related to professional engineering works in the High Court. Rejected the constitutional request because Article 212 is banned. The terms of service of persons in service of Pakistan in matters of constitution validity T services are those of Parliament under the Federal Constitution Act or Article 240 of the Constitution of Pakistan Engineering Council Act 1976 as well as Parliament under the Civil Servants Act 1976 Falls into the category of the act produced by. In order to qualify for the specified position, the applicant must go to the Service Tribunal which was banned under the provisions of Section 4, Service Tribunals Act 1973, was not fitness or proper and did not qualify the applicant as strict. Was challenged or qualified, but the ability of the defendant to hold certain positions could already be crossed or justified if the parties had to check the terms of service as per the publicity permit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sialkot lawyer