Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) appealed against the acquittal convictions that the High Court waived the notice that the medical evidence was, in the end, proved by the assailants to be Injures the number and nature of casualties. Do not present any material in the identification of the assailants; that eyewitnesses were mistaken as interested witnesses and in any case their relationship with the victim was not sufficient to disregard their witnesses. ? That the day of the evacuation vacancies coincided with Kalashnikov's arrest, which confirmed the testimony of eyewitnesses in connection with the daylight incident and, in the presence of credible witnesses, was not intended. Due to presence or weakness or mystery, it was given a slight priority in order to allow the appellant to appeal whether the High Court was acquitted of the accused under Section 302, PPC, under the facts of this case. Right or not? attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bat Khela lawyer