Find a Lawyer

MARIAM versus ZUBAIDA BAI

The issue of confiscation of licensed rifle and licensed applicant under Articles 12 and 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 was chalked out under section 302/324/148/149, PPC, but the agreement between the deceased and the applicant's heirs. As a result, the applicant was acquitted. Police seized the police with a licensed rifle belonging to the applicant during the investigation, but no case was registered against him and the trial court under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 as a result of the settlement. The applicant was acquitted, with no order passed. In connection with the return of the rifle and the license to the applicant, the petitioner's application for the return of the license and the rifle was rejected by the trial court on the grounds that the government had directed the police to collect illegal arms through the culprits. Was used, such a trial observation. The court was not enforceable at first because the rifle was a licensee; secondly, it was not a function of the police to collect illegal weapons as it was the police's duty to collect the illegal weapons against the applicant under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965. No case was filed, so the trial court had no jurisdiction to seize the applicant's rifle and license in favor of the state. best advocate from Sialkot lawyer