Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/304/337/148/149 bail, the same accused and his father's grant were also injured during the same incident and were shot. Injuries and similar injuries. Those who did not prove to be self-inflicted were not covered by the prosecution, but in fact they were mentioned in the FIR themselves by cross-firing which resulted in injuries to both parties, counter challan was presented and scrutiny. But it was found out that it was the complaining party that attacked the firearms that led to the crossfire. If this was the case, the attack was carried out by the complaining party rather than the accused, so there is a reasonable basis for proving that the culprits are guilty of the death penalty or life imprisonment. Was not present, and in this scenario, the trial against the accused would be a matter of further inquiry, which would enable the accused to bail out, the accused was granted bail. advocate for immigration from Bolan lawyer