MIRZA GHIAS BEG versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 468 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 199 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), S 561 Penalty of Constitutional Petition in the decision of the court to move along with the sentence. The special court was found guilty of two cases for speedy trial under Section 686868, PPC and in each case with a fine, RI was sentenced to seven years in prison. The two separate appeals filed by the Supreme Court were dismissed by the Supreme Court. It is announced that the convictions will run concurrently in both cases, however, upon receipt of a copy of the verdict in jail, it was found that both sentence sentences were directed under Article 184 (3) to run the constitutional petition filed by the accused in the Supreme Court. Was not done After the constitution was withdrawn to correct the error, it was rejected because it wanted to file a constitutional application in this matter. According to which High Court it has accordingly agreed to it under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Reading with 561A, the CC defendant fully supported the defendants' argument on the affidavit of five lawyers present in the courtroom. At the same time, these sentences had to be relied upon because the abolitionists had no motive to falsely impeach them since the Supreme Appeal Court had been accused in matters related to Article 4 of the Constitution. Everyone has the right to enjoy the protection of the law. Pursuant to the law and in which case the mere rectification of the error can be removed under the aegis of the High Court under its inherent powers under Section A61 AA, CR PC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Daharki lawyer