FAZAL MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM HAIDER
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) by the plaintiff's Additional Commissioner claiming to have the case dismissed by the collector under premature notice, however, found that the waiver petition Was not established The Board of Revenue has kept such results on record, after thorough scrutiny of the material on the record, rejected the constitutional petition on the ground that the orders passed by the Revenue Classification We do not suffer from weakness or chronic defects, constitutional jurisdiction is arbitrary in nature, the High Court has based on the evidence on record , Rejecting the jurisdiction that merely to respond to a specific issue in clear terms is to interfere with the decisions of the court of taxation on the basis of alleged error and to guarantee that no interference is guaranteed on good grounds. Was on The appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Islamabad lawyer