Find a Lawyer

PAPOO ALIAS ABDUL KARIM versus THE STATE

Section 302 of the Sindh Children Act (XIV of 1955), sections 68 (2) and 71 convicted of life imprisonment, was less than sixteen years in the history of the incident, and on this he passed the age of eighteen. Was done The date of his sentence, therefore, in view of section 68 (2) of the Sindh Children Act 1955 and section 71 of the aforesaid act, the accused could not be sentenced to life imprisonment, but not even in detention. Could have been taken. A certified school or accredited institution, no doubt, could be fined but could be convicted under Section 230 accused in default of payment of fines, not challenged PPC. But he was sentenced to prison. Temporary life imprisonment and one year imprisonment for payment of a fine of Rs 50,000 were given by the trial court in which the accused were acquitted in these circumstances, however, the penalty imposed on the accused was upheld. ? Which was to be recovered under Section 544A & 545, CR PC was read with Section 386, CR PC divorce advocates from Khandabad lawyer