ABDUL HALEEM,XEN versus PROVINCEOFPUNJAB
Basic rules FR 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The respondent civil servant was in gainful employment after moving abroad and the absence of the respondents after seven years living in Pakistan Had changed to a different one. Against this request, the petitioners (government employees) in front of the departmental authorities demanded unsuccessful forms of junior, whereby the absence of the defendant was regularized and he was re-employed but without any success. The service was not appealed by the applicants to the Tribunal. The applicant's legal complaint was that because of a seven-year absence, the defendant was left in public service, so, the government could not restore him to his post, no matter the case. Whether or not the defendant should have been re-served, there was one between him and the governors that the agitated protests against the applicant had nothing to do with their terms and conditions of service. The respondent will maintain his or her age and will not give the applicant a reason for the proceedings, but in the circumstances, the appeal is refused. Was done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer