ANWARSHAH versus MUHAMMADASIF
Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 212 and 185 (3) The appointment of subordinates had to be filled through the selection of subordinate officers through advertisement on seventy percent of the posts. As Assistant and Senior Scale Stenographer, work, the Board of Revenue and the Offices are subordinate to those who had at least three years of experience with applicants whose length of service was longer than the length of the respondent. Was chosen on the respondents' constitutional request. The High Court allowed on the basis that during the appointment of the students, the selection board should not have kept the total length of the services of the officers but that the cadre of the assistant petitioners should have been limited to seniority. The High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the constitutional petition by the respondent in the matter of a question, only within the competence of the Service Tribunal, such an objection was raised by the Government but On the basis that it was rejected that fitness was involved in the development of a public servant and that no such dispute could be raised in front of the service. The Tribunal Petitioners claimed that the doctrine adopted by the High Court was not wrong with the determination of the respondent's fitness to develop as a Tehsildar but rather for the determination of the principle of selection of the Tehsildar, namely for the purpose of appointing the Tehsildar. Whether, as an assistant, an official should be concerned only or should the entire service of the officer be treated as such, the decision of the parties to the terms and conditions of the procedure
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Jaranwala lawyer