Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADMUKHTARSHEIKH versus AZIZAHMEDHASHMI,CHAIRMAN,BOARDOFINTERMEDIATEANDSECONDARYEDUCATION,SARGODHA

The applicant was not given any opportunity before the negative remarks to pass before the negative remarks listed in the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 Service Tribunal were passed, therefore, the applicants used frivolous words against fish, obstruction and boogie. Were not only unnecessary but were not germane to the dispute in question and therefore did not need to meet the requirements of the law, such words were also speculated on their faces if the personal role of the service tribunal applicant. When he wanted to say something, he needed to give him the opportunity to explain his position. Such remarks cannot be made without the person having to hear that the objectionable remarks used against the applicant were excluded from the decision of the service tribunal. It will be deemed that the remarks were never approved by the service tribunal against the applicant, the appeal was changed for leave and the extent to which the remarks against the applicant were allowed. ? Pakistan, top advocate family court from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer