ASMATULLAHKHAN versus GOVERNMENTOFPUNJAB
Article 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 105 and 199 Order to restore government employees was withdrawn after eight years The only order taken by the Governor was that the previous order was passed on 11 198 1986, in this regard The Governor was advised to do so by providing Article 105 of the S&GAD, Wing Department and the Advocate General Constitution under which the Governor acted on the advice of the Governor Chief Minister or the cabinet constitution (1973). There is nowhere to act on the advice of Governor S&GAD, the Regulation Wing of the Law Department and the Advocate General, on such advice which Or order is passed or may not support the ruling order under Section 22 of the Punjab, the Punjab government employees about the options can not pass. The Act, 1974, itself could not be divorced from the Constitution and all the orders passed under Section 22, Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, can have legal effect only if they are approved in a pass. The applicant of the petitioner complying with the Constitution Order requested that the Governor be approved on the advice of the Chief Minister, and that the Governor had full authority under the Constitution, whereas the order responsible for the withdrawal was approved by the Governor. Before the order was made, the order for re-appointment was withdrawn, declared to have no legal effect and no legal result was taken that the applicant would not be in service under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Nilam lawyer