Find a Lawyer

NEIMAT ALI GORAYA versus JAFFAR ABBAS, INSPECTOR/SARGEANT TRAFFIC

R12 2 (3) Assigning seniority to Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R8 seniority police officers Applicable to the determination of special law or common law seniority where special law as well as special law apply happens. In a particular case, to the extent that special law is applied in this Act, the provisions of the Common Law are bound by the Displaced Rule 8, Punjab Government Employees (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, Applies to all applications. Government employees in Punjab to determine their seniority inter-seconds, while R 12 2 (3), Police Rules, 1934, which is related to the same subject, applies to the specific category of public servants, namely the members of the police force. ? ()), Police Rules, 34 193434, is, therefore, a special provision of the law, while 8, Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 4 law 197 197, is a general supply of law, both of which are the same subject. Work with Provision of R12 2 (3) of ect, Police Rules, 1934, will, therefore, apply in the case of police officers and to that extent, the Punjab Government Employees (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974, both sets do not apply. Will be. Government employees were recruited and certified in the same history, their sanity was determined precisely under R12 2 (3), the Police Rules, 1934, were issued by the Department Authority to the service tribunal according to their own age. Did not justify the disturbing sanity. Both sets of police officers and respondents, as determined by the Department of the Order of Service Tribunal, were set aside and the departmental authority restored. power of attorney advocate Piplan lawyer