The Special Relief Act, 1877, challenged such a decree in terms of section 42 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OX, R 13, sections 12 (2), and section 12 (2) in the case under the pre-Penal Code. The perpetrator is in a pending trial. But to no avail, the plaintiff could file an appeal against the ex parte decree but instead of filing the appeal, he filed an application under section 12 (2) which was dismissed if the amendment would take place only if In the event that no appeal is enforceable, the trial defendant had simultaneously pronounced the judgment. The application was filed under AIX, R 11, CPC, which could not yet allow the trial court to take advantage of two remedies at the same time under the OIC, R13, CPC The trial court was unable to review the presence of the trial proceedings. O IX, R 13, By filing the first appeal before the trial court or under the first appellate court under CPC, defendant was not barred from receiving his treatment unless he could bring his case to the profession. These circumstances were excluded because the law was not authorized to be reviewed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
