MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus AAMER REHMAN
Refer to Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and O VIII of the CPC Written Statement, 6 6 in response to the defendant's claim of adjustment / refund of the specific amount spent by him for the renovation / construction of some rooms. , The defendant of the institute did not present any evidence to prove the renovation / construction. With the permission of the owner, there was no evidence presented by the defendant that he had admitted in his proof of leave claim that he had become a tenant under the plaintiffs on the basis of the lease agreement in which There is no payment to the previous owner or any recitation in this regard. The purpose of the reconstruction / construction by the plaintiff's contract was also not conditional on the fact that the owner would pay the defendant with respect to such construction / renovation. Cannot claim that there is no relief through adjustment or allegedly security payment etc. can be made to the defendant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Hariwala lawyer
