Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

DEEDAR ALI versus THE STATE


Definition of evidence in Pakistan Panel Code S, 304, Part I. The eyewitnesses were declared admissible for not supporting the prosecution case, the accused had already withdrew his judicial confession, which was not provided by any other evidence. Since the magistrate was proven not to have made such a recording, he could not be the basis of the sentence, even otherwise it was said that the confession was voluntary and not true, an important piece of evidence against the accused. Cannot be used as, under Section 164, witnesses' statements, CCP was subjected to serious misconduct for not providing the opportunity to counsel and investigate the accused, there is no basis for punishment. Make it.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.