Find a Lawyer

MEHRAJ DIN versus WAJID ALI

Limitation Act 1908 Section 14 Punjab Pre-Emission Act (I of 1913), Section 4 and 30 Land Reform Regulation, 1972 (M: LR 115), delaying the filing of para 25 Condition Plaintiffs / Pre-Impressors who prematurely granted the right Did not claim image rights. On the basis of tenancy, instead of being taken by the plaintiff / Wendy by the plaintiff / Wendy in connection with the wrong forum, the suit was filed before the Collector / Revenue Court, the collector plaintiff was sued by the appropriate civil court. I returned the plaintiff for submission and after receiving two years from the sale of the land in the dispute to the plaintiff, the appellate court, as well as the plaintiff, excluding the time spent in the proceedings before the collector. The benefit of section 14 of the Limitation Act 1908 allowed and was found within a reasonable time. , The plaintiff was not entitled to expire as a matter of time in the Revenue Court because in order to obtain the exemption of the provisions of section 14, the Act, 1V 08, must show that the good faith against the wrong court. The plaintiff had failed to prove the alleged confusion in connection with the case before proceeding with and before filing a lawsuit, the courts had proceeded illegally with the Revenue Court, leaving the trial period pending. To file law firms from Silanwala lawyer