Find a Lawyer

MUNDA APPAREL (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus COMMISSIONER, SINDH EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, KARACHI

West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance 1965 Sections 1 (3), 20 and 64 Contributing Responsibility Appeal Qualifications Original Partners Names that are based on the childhood name and manner of section 1 (3) of the West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance. Was notified under , 1965, and paying the contribution amount, it was taken over by the appellant establishment, which started its own premises under a different name appellant establishment, which initially continued to pay the contribution amount, later paying the same claim. Unless and unless a separate notification was issued under section 1 (3) of the West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance, 1965, the appellant establishment would not be responsible for paying the contribution. The appellant establishment was placed in the same premises. Establishment was established in childhood and two directors were stationed there. The shipment was also working in the Appellant Establishment, though the various monograms in the various designs were adopted by the Appellant Establishment as taken on the Childhood / Establishment and the readymade garment was the same business as the Occupation / Former Establishment, Appellant Establishment was undergoing appellant Establishment so was allegedly undergoing dissolution. \ Childhood \ Establishment In fact, the Appellant Establishment was successful in occupying the childhood over except the Establishment and its name was changed to employers, the Childhood Establishment, thus, could not be considered closed. Was made and the appellant establishment simply renamed the appellant appellant immigration advocates contact from Baroute lawyer