BANARAS KHAN versus THE STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Section 6 316/34 of Definition of Evidence Accused of extrajudicial behavior of an eye witness and appearing before the police, his testimony was inconsistent with the evidence of any other witness. ? There was nothing to be investigated by the mob's investigating officer on the spot, or at the trial to support the witnesses' claims that Danda's recovery was delayed after a lengthy delay and deliberation. The terminating FIR was ensured. The accused, who was charged with a gun, further subverted the prosecution's case as it was charged to the commission of the crime that the evidence of the prosecution was extremely unreliable and confidence was not encouraged. Was acquitted on behalf of.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Yazman Mandi lawyer
