Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE

Arts & evidence ????? Testimony of evidence Civil prosecution witness who was also a police officer driver was not immediately a witness to the incident because he himself stated that the complainant who was the police officer / investigating officer was recovered from the accused about heroin. I told. The complainant / investigating officer stated in his statement and through his recovery memo that he had separated the sample from the main packet on the spot and the two were separated in the parcel, but this fact was not addressed to the prosecution. The witness did not testify, contrary to the fact that the chemical examiner who analyzed the material sent to him was regularly appointed and the government chemical agent was not notified that The chemical allegedly recovered from the accused was received by the Chemical Examiner after a delay of thirty days and such The end was not specified by the prosecution. The recovery memo was allegedly prepared on the occasion when no FIR was yet to be registered at the relevant police station but despite this the recovery memo still gave rise to a large number of FIRs, which it showed It is likely that all the formal steps at the police station have been completed, even at the site of the alleged recovery, it was not proved by the prosecution that everything related to the case against the accused was either unprofessional or suspicious. , The sentence or sentence against him could not be retained, which was set aside and he was acquitted of the charge. us immigration advocates from Naukot lawyer