DILON LIMITED LABOUR UNION versus DILON LIMITED
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, in its application filed under Section 38 (3) and 50 of the Labor Appellate Tribunal Union's jurisdiction grant under the Settlement Benefit, the Tribunal claimed in its application that the employees And the benefits claimed under the Union Settlement were claimed under Section 50 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the Tribunal was not invested with jurisdiction through an appeal for reasonable compensation to workers because of Section 50 The appeal under the Workers Union jurisdiction did not match the jurisdiction Relations Ordinance, 196 9 The Tribunal could only act when there was any difficulty or doubt about the interpretation of an award or settlement, such interpretation and compromise under the Rules of Interpretation should be in accordance with the language and not the alleged settlement between them. According to the intention attributed to the ones. The parties, when the settlement language was simple, could not return to the tribunal and could not find the true intent of the parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Mari Indus lawyer