HASSAN versus HUSSAN
OXLI; R27 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), a substantial matter of mutation accuracy of Sections 39 and 40, preparation of additional evidence where the wiring of the change in the revenue record was challenged, would be necessary for the other party. Who was earning an award. To prove the above-mentioned variations in practice, the title is strongly in favor of the party, who has denied the title of the said entries, but if the evidence relies on it, the party relies on it. Can be rejected. They had to bring the records on the record when the matter was directly related to the wiring of the changes, without the court seeing any documents that were in dispute and wanting to prove or reject the documents without question. A decision could not be made without the person's statement being recorded. O XLI, R 27, the factor was sufficient to bring about the intended expression in the CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Hattian lawyer