Find a Lawyer

EJAZ AHMAD MIR versus SHAMSA KHATOON

Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) The Landlord's Appetite Personal Needs The landlord's family consisted of eleven members, four of whom were overseas and occasionally visited with the family and the remaining seven families. Were permanently located in one part of the premises. Apart from the drawing-less dining room, which consisted of only three bedrooms, the residence was not enough for the landlord to reside with his family members, the occasional visit of the children of the landlord abroad, It cannot be said that this will positively impact the homeowner's need. The fact that the three-bedroom first-floor personal residence and the second child will never be enough for parents to live with them is a fact that under the law, the tenant has more options for a year than the rent increase. Was given. This does not mean that the landlord will not be entitled to take possession of the premises for the time being in the future e-tenant even when he will need it in good faith as he thinks the above option For a further period of one year, after which the period expired, then Landlady could not be deprived of the possession of the house which was once rented. It list of supreme court advocates from Mangal Sada lawyer